Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757074AbcCCLQI (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:16:08 -0500 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:40103 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756228AbcCCLQG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:16:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] ARM: DRA7: hwmod: Add data for McASP1/2/4/5/6/7/8 To: Paul Walmsley References: <1456411827-23962-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1456411827-23962-11-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <56D5C6B1.6040005@ti.com> CC: Tony Lindgren , , Tero Kristo , , , , From: Peter Ujfalusi Message-ID: <56D81C49.6030706@ti.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:13:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1159 Lines: 37 Hi Paul, On 03/01/2016 07:01 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> 2. The patch sets HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE for McASP1 and 2, but doesn't set it >>> for McASP4-8. Could you please confirm that this is intentional, and if >>> so, why? The descriptions of the MODULEMODE fields in SPRUHZ6 look >>> identical. >> >> I need to confirm this, but all McASP should have the same set of flags. > > OK. Looking at McASP3 data this morning, they probably shouldn't need > HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE, but probably all need > > .modulemode = MODULEMODE_SWCTRL, > >>> 3. Can McASP1,2,3 bus-master onto the L3? If so, then there should be >>> "dra7xx_mcasp1__l3_main_1"-style links to indicate this. >> >> I need to check this, but I don't think McASP1,2,3 can be bus-master onto L3. > > OK. When you get back, maybe doublecheck this - it looks to me from > SPRUHZ6 that McASP1-3 have built-in DMA controllers. They are only targets on L3. Not sure about the built-in DMA controller > >> I can resend the series next week as I'm out of office this week. > > That's fine. It's most likely v4.7 material at this point. > > > - Paul > -- Péter