Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757432AbcCCLTE (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:19:04 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34654 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756774AbcCCLTB (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 06:19:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:18:58 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching Message-ID: <20160303111858.GM6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <2495375.dFbdlAZmA6@vostro.rjw.lan> <26020775.9hJG2SHiH2@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26020775.9hJG2SHiH2@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 325 Lines: 10 On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:12:33AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > +void cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation) > +{ > + unsigned int freq; > + > + if (target_freq == policy->cur) > + return; But what if relation is different from last time? ;-)