Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757550AbcCCNaK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:10 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:36926 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754338AbcCCNaI (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:30:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:29:56 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Neil Armstrong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] arm: Add new mach-oxnas Message-ID: <20160303132956.GW19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1457005210-18485-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1457005210-18485-13-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <3226743.49AyJYeiGh@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3226743.49AyJYeiGh@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 12 On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:56:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As Russell mentioned, the entire file is not really needed either, but > so far we have left the trivial per-platform files in place generally. I think that's something we should be looking to remove: if the per-platform files give no benefit, then there is no point in having them, and they just increase the size of the code base. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.