Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:21:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:21:04 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:17550 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:21:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:29:34 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andi Kleen Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Dcache hash distrubition patches Message-ID: <20030311172934.GB8268@krispykreme> References: <10280000.1047318333@[10.10.2.4]> <20030310175221.GA20060@averell> <26350000.1047368465@[10.10.2.4]> <20030311152322.GA2358@averell> <31840000.1047396682@[10.10.2.4]> <20030311162734.GA5640@averell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030311162734.GA5640@averell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 609 Lines: 16 > I doubt inode cache is very critical, except perhaps in NFS server loads > (but even the nfs server has an own frontend cache) > Normally the dcache should bear most of the load. I did some analysis of the hashes ages ago. From memory the regular grouping of inodes caused this unbalanced distribution: http://samba.org/~anton/linux/hashes/1/icache.png Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/