Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932744AbcCCSCJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:02:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f195.google.com ([209.85.213.195]:36064 "EHLO mail-ig0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932690AbcCCSCH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:02:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160303164533.3025.82439.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20160303164533.3025.82439.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:02:06 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: inS7eo8_5me-3vBXWtxJmgUP01U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling From: Linus Torvalds To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Matthew Garrett , Tony Luck , DRI , Fenghua Yu , Intel Graphics Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ralf Baechle , Andy Lutomirski , =?UTF-8?Q?Bruno_Pr=C3=A9mont?= , Daniel Stone , Alex Deucher , =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 334 Lines: 10 On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > The purpose of this series is to: > [ .. ] The patches look ok to me and seem to make sense. Of course, let's see what they break. Hopefully nothing, but any time the PCI resource code changes I get a bit worried. PTSD, I guess. Linus