Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:04:46 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@ezchip.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/12] task_isolation: support
 CONFIG_TASK_ISOLATION_ALL
Message-ID: <20160303200446.GA5083@two.firstfloor.org>
References: <1456949376-4910-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
 <1456949376-4910-6-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
 <87mvqfe7h3.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <56D8931E.4060205@mellanox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56D8931E.4060205@mellanox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 269
Lines: 7

> The same arguments would seem to apply to TASK_ISOLATION_ALL;
> note that applications don't actually go into task isolation mode
> without issuing the appropriate prctl(), so it shouldn't be too

That's a fair point. If it's entirely opt-in it's probably ok.

-Andi