Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751792AbcCDFtl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 00:49:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:36049 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024AbcCDFth (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 00:49:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:19:24 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , Vincent Guittot , Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: governor: New data type for management part of dbs_data Message-ID: <20160304054924.GB27109@vireshk-i7> References: <2495375.dFbdlAZmA6@vostro.rjw.lan> <3567040.O8oI5B24Ng@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160303055359.GI2891@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 20 On 03-03-16, 20:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So this is a totally bicycle shed discussion argument which makes it > seriously irritating. > > Does it really matter so much how this structure is called? > Essentially, it is something to build your tunables structure around > and you can treat it as a counterpart of a C++ abstract class. So the > name *does* make sense in that context. :( I thought you will apply this patch to linux-next *now*, as it was quite independent and so gave such comment. > That said, what about gov_attr_set? Maybe just gov_kobj or whatever you wish. -- viresh