Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:16:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:15:05 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:32005 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:14:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:23:24 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Stephen Hemminger cc: David Miller , Robert Love , Zwane Mwaikambo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Subject: Re: [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU In-Reply-To: <1047428032.15874.87.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 21 On 11 Mar 2003, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The following sequence of patches replaces the remaining use of brlock > with RCU. Most of this is fairly straightforward. The unregister functions > use synchronize_kernel(), perhaps there should be a special version to > indicate sychronizing with network BH. > > Comments? I'm not going to take this directly, but if it passes muster with David, I'm happy. The fewer locking primitives we need, the better, and brlocks have had enough problems that I wouldn't mind getting rid of them. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/