Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:18:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:18:26 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:30220 "EHLO smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:18:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 03:28:38 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Patrick Mochel cc: Greg KH , Oliver Neukum , Linux Kernel List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Jeff Garzik , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: PCI driver module unload race? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1123 Lines: 31 Hi, On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > > Greg, and Rusty, are right. Dealing with this is a PITA, and I think will > > > always be. I'm willing to take the Nancy Reagan platform, too. > > > > Right with what? > > With the idea that unloading modules is a bad idea. With the current module refcount model I can only agree. OTOH I need a sufficiently complex example, which gets the module locking right (file systems are just too simple), then I can actually produce a patch, which shows the advantages of a different model and the driver model/sysfs looks like an interesting victim. :) > > What is the "Nancy Reagan platform"? > > "Just say no". It was a big anti-drug campaign in the US targeted at > schoolchildren, spearheaded in the mid-80's by Nancy Reagan. Well, this always look simple, but it hardly ever solves the real problem. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/