Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751503AbcCFNyn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 6 Mar 2016 08:54:43 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55946 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751394AbcCFNye (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 6 Mar 2016 08:54:34 -0500
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 05:54:30 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races
Message-ID: <20160306135430.GA17315@kroah.com>
References: <8737sjo7qa.fsf@gmail.com>
 <20160305212613.GA29738@kroah.com>
 <87egbn3gxb.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87egbn3gxb.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1021
Lines: 29

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> >> patch [4/8].
> >> 
> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> >> review yet.
> >
> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
> 
> Great, thank you!
> 
> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
> sent v5 in order to correct this.
> 
> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.

What do the fixup patches look like?  That might be easier to take if
they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
isn't a big deal...)

thanks,

greg k-h