Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752867AbcCGQe3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:34:29 -0500
Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com ([209.85.213.50]:34641 "EHLO
	mail-vk0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752656AbcCGQeV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:34:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VckTVD8b1g+f0G2kMeoTjvY0pAGhoDnWQN_dAmqSxBxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=WL3jYEgVe-m6QcAyQwfJgdX4J5OtKisKwyoKOrTSpEQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160125170855.GA10182@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=Xvxeqo3imUmjukC5iYk3EZkrJ04G7C1B-w4xyr-r6-2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160203145337.GD9650@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=U_x1cxx6RrHuVgVV8GbOwm9DXXJcyiArbbQySUOaxrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160222175929.GA23899@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=UCErW3EjYRtwt49_ztNR7cyY4U0o4R_dxdomer-Ac2Dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160223143859.GA27656@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=UvxG3MYD4MKQJqN7W68uMjd-s+FH-e8tkrLCpS0RLmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160223181448.GA14754@ulmo.nvidia.com>
	<CAD=FV=VM3cOQ0HqwLANBw9MVBCyFTrSyPe_dGzgPucuMUEWRKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD=FV=VckTVD8b1g+f0G2kMeoTjvY0pAGhoDnWQN_dAmqSxBxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:34:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W3KPf8tyMviVNB9=HjefMdP+FBbN01Zhh7RKH+gkj2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        linux-pwm <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= 
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 943
Lines: 29

Thierry,

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> wrote:
> So just to summarize:
>
> * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> support readout.
>
> * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
>
> * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
>
> * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> hardware readout.
>
> * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
>
> * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
>
>
> Did I get all that right?  Thanks!

Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
understand"?  That will unblock Boris, I think.

-Doug