Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:34 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:43715 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:33 -0500 Subject: Re: bio too big device From: Alan Cox To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andre Hedrick , scott thomason , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030312090943.GA3298@suse.de> References: <20030312085145.GJ811@suse.de> <20030312090943.GA3298@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1047485697.22696.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Mar 2003 16:14:58 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 883 Lines: 23 On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 09:09, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > > So lets dirty list the one drive by Paul G. and be done. > > Can we do that? > > Who cares, really? There's not much point in doing it, we're talking 248 > vs 256 sectors in reality. I think it's a _bad_ idea, lets just keep it > at 255 and avoid silly drive bugs there. 255 trashes your performance, 128 will perform far better with most setups. This is especially true with raid setups. I'd much rather we got the IDE layer using 256 block writes even if we have to limit it to more modern drives by some handwaving (8Gb+ say) Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/