Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:54:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:54:17 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:50884 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:54:16 -0500 Subject: Re: bio too big device From: Alan Cox To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andre Hedrick , scott thomason , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030312151117.GH834@suse.de> References: <20030312085145.GJ811@suse.de> <20030312090943.GA3298@suse.de> <1047485697.22696.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030312151117.GH834@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1047489166.22694.44.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Mar 2003 17:12:47 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 15:11, Jens Axboe wrote: > Then go with 128. I'd like to stress again that _if_ you get worse > performance it's not due to the request being a bit smaller, but indeed > because 248 can cause badly aligned requests. > > > got the IDE layer using 256 block writes even if we have to limit it > > to more modern drives by some handwaving (8Gb+ say) > > Does Windows use 256 sector requests or not? If not, then I'd sure don't > want to do it in Linux, the handwaving doesn't mean anything then. I am told it does, Andre can you confirm this either way. If not then its time to ask vendors to confirm and any vendor who says "our drives are fine" we put on the ok list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/