Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933787AbcCHART (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:17:19 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:39869 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933082AbcCHARG (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:17:06 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Serge Hallyn , Seth Forshee , lkml , =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= Graber References: <20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com> <87oaar2ryz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:07:11 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:24:23 -0800") Message-ID: <87lh5t7ryo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+J2sqrnq7fLeS5vi5ApoxpJheOpz0eg/A= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.59.168.211 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.2179] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Andy Lutomirski X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 360 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.0 (1.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.9 (0.8%), parse: 0.93 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (4.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.91 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.6 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.20 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 14 (4.0%), check_bayes: 13 (3.7%), b_tokenize: 3.8 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.1 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.31 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.1 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.70 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 311 (86.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.43 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.8 (0.8%), tests_pri_500: 4.1 (1.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:52 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 585 Lines: 15 Andy Lutomirski writes: > On a related note, can we *please* find a way to constrain namespace > creation in a way that might satisfy the RHEL crowd? I am not certain to what you are referrring. As long as folks are willing to work with me I am happy to help design and design something that makes things better for everyone. If someone pushes hard, suggestes crappy patches, and does not listen to constructive feedback I will shoot their patches down (especially when I am sick and tired as I have been more than I would like this development cycle). Eric