MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87lh5t7ryo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
References: <20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com> <87oaar2ryz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
 <CALCETrXUcWnP-mvdJCUy91iJ8U+0=K0WHEs1p8h89SisQr0ZOQ@mail.gmail.com> <87lh5t7ryo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:24:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CALCETrXGr8Trd=N62GvgE_gzYEUxxnSBQefuYPnYna0sCWfpMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Graber?= <stgraber@ubuntu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 849
Lines: 18

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
>
>> On a related note, can we *please* find a way to constrain namespace
>> creation in a way that might satisfy the RHEL crowd?
>
> I am not certain to what you are referrring.
>
> As long as folks are willing to work with me I am happy to help design
> and design something that makes things better for everyone.  If someone
> pushes hard, suggestes crappy patches, and does not listen to
> constructive feedback I will shoot their patches down (especially when I
> am sick and tired as I have been more than I would like this development
> cycle).

I think we should add some mechanism that will allow the right to
create various namespaces to be constrained in a useful and usable
manner.  I'll start a new thread.