Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932615AbcCHPer (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:34:47 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43672 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754291AbcCHPei (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:34:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:34:35 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Balbir Singh Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pmladek@suse.com, jeyu@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc Message-ID: <20160308153435.GA23804@lst.de> References: <1457422437-3357-1-git-send-email-bsingharora@gmail.com> <20160308104552.GA16502@lst.de> <56DED903.2000209@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56DED903.2000209@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2125 Lines: 70 On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:52:03AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > > On 08/03/16 21:45, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > To be fair, my last mail still was not 100% correct, but the conclusion Wrote a correction to the correction. It should be clear now. Please nag me if it isn't clear why klp_return_helper and its stack frame is needed. > > that the mini frame is not needed at all is invalid. Please leave it as it > > was, I'm working on a test / demonstrator for how to handle these. > Why, the magic will be in the patched function? Please share the test/demonstrator Here it comes... > > NAKed-by: Torsten Duwe > Why? For using CR+4 or removing the frame? Or you believe there is a better way to > handle this that work, IOW what is broken? The stack frame removal. You're risking a memory access or jump into nirvana or and endless loop. klp_return_helper will do the right thing, and functions like e.g. printk I would live patch like this (untested :-) : ------------------------8<---------------------- #include /* compile using "-ffixed-r14"! */ register unsigned long pass_TOC asm("r14"); /* * Function pre-prologue to pop the klp_return_helper * mini stack frame. The saved r2 TOC value is read and * passed in pass_TOC (r14), the original LR is passed * in r0 and the LR itself. R12 is updated appropriately * for local TOC recalculation. */ extern void caller(void) asm("printk"); void caller(void) { asm("ld %0,24(1)" : "=r" (pass_TOC)); asm("addi 1,1,32"); asm("addi 12,12,(real_printk-printk)@l"); asm("ld 0,16(1)\n\tmtlr 0"); asm("b real_printk"); } extern int vprintk_default(const char *fmt, va_list args); extern int printk(const char *fmt, ...) asm("real_printk"); int printk(const char *fmt, ...) { va_list args; int r; va_start(args, fmt); r = vprintk_default(fmt, args); va_end(args); asm("mr 2,%0" : : "r" (pass_TOC)); return r; } ------------------------8<---------------------- Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe As you can see, the extra effort for args on the stack is limited. Torsten