Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932286AbcCHP6u (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:58:50 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34509 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbcCHP6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:58:40 -0500 Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Wim Van Sebroeck , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20160307150402.191ba735@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fu Wei , Guenter Roeck , Sudeep Holla From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Przywara?= Organization: ARM Ltd. Message-ID: <56DEF546.9090900@arm.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:52:38 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160307150402.191ba735@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 31 On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Wim, > > Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts > > between commit: > > d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the GIC separately") > > from the arm-soc tree and commit: > > fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts") > > from the watchdog tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the GICv2-only .dts. So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the .dtsi file? If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the breakage is not really critical). Cheers, Andre.