Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751229AbcCHSUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:20:41 -0500 Received: from smtp2.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.81]:60095 "EHLO smtp2.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750907AbcCHSUd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:20:33 -0500 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH -tip 0/3] locking/rtmutex: Another crack at spin on owner Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:20:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1457461223-4301-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1053 Lines: 29 Hi, This is a (painfully late) followup to proposal sometime ago to add spin on owner to rtmutexes. My first attempt was rather liberal in that I tried avoiding the pi-dance and let the lock be stolen. However, due to -rt constraints this series only deals with top-waiter, based on what we do in the preempt rt patchset. First two patches are trivial and the whole patchset as survived a week of locktorture+pi_stress pounding at the same time without anything breaking. That said, I'm sure it needs more testing and eyeballs, these paths make my head hurt. Thanks! Davidlohr Bueso (3): rtmutex: Delete save_state member of struct rt_mutex rtmutex: Add rt_mutex_init_waiter helper rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on a lock include/linux/rtmutex.h | 1 - kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++ kernel/futex.c | 5 +-- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 17 ++++++++- 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4