Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:48:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:48:01 -0500 Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.243.207]:59141 "EHLO vitelus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:48:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:57:55 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann To: Ben Collins Cc: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BK->CVS (real time mirror) Message-ID: <20030313025755.GK408@vitelus.com> References: <20030312174244.GC13792@work.bitmover.com> <20030312183413.GH563@phunnypharm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312183413.GH563@phunnypharm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 28 On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > But being a person who also has certain beliefs, I am not going to stand > on the side lines and watch the fight. Then I guess you'll get killfiled by a lot of people. I don't like bk's licensing either but I'm not going to whine for months about it. Linus knows how people feel about it and he's made a decision to use bk anyway. People have tried to change his mind, and they have failed. If you have a problem with bk, please just ignore it. Send diffs the old way. Why not pick on Microsoft or Adobe? When you complain about Larry trying to steal 10% of your data (wtf? Linus still releases regularly. I don't see how we have any less data than before even without BK), you're wasting your energy and annoying the huge fraction of people who read this mailing list who don't care what software Linus or anyone else wants to run. The only thing that gets on my nerves is when people don't bother to make GNU patches available. If Larry is able to turn the diff exporter on eventually, this should make the problem almost moot. To someone who doesn't use BK, people posting changesets would essentially just be hosting their patches on bkbits.net. And if they want to host them there, who am I to tell them no, no matter how they get there or what format they're stored in internally? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/