Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965792AbcCJLTr (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:19:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:35524 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965715AbcCJLTk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:19:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:19:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Fenghua Yu , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Oleg Nesterov , "Yu, Yu-cheng" Subject: Re: Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot Message-ID: <20160310111935.GB13102@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2115 Lines: 54 I've Cc:-ed more FPU developers. Mail quoted below. I don't have a Quark system to test this on, but maybe others have an idea why this warning triggers? My thinking is that it's related to: 58122bf1d856 x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all CPUs Thanks, Ingo * Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Today tried first time after long break to boot Intel Quark SoC with > most recent linux-next. Got the following warning: > > [ 14.714533] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 823 at > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:163 fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160 > [ 14.726603] Modules linked in: > [ 14.729910] CPU: 0 PID: 823 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted > 4.5.0-rc7-next-20160310+ #137 > [ 14.738307] 00000000 00000000 ce691e20 c12b6fc9 ce691e50 c1049fd1 > c1978c6c 00000000 > [ 14.747000] 00000337 c196b530 000000a3 c102050c 000000a3 ce587ac0 > 00000000 ce653000 > [ 14.755722] ce691e64 c104a095 00000009 00000000 00000000 ce691e74 > c102050c ce587500 > [ 14.764468] Call Trace: > [ 14.767172] [] dump_stack+0x16/0x1d > [ 14.771889] [] __warn+0xd1/0xf0 > [ 14.776253] [] ? fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160 > [ 14.781234] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x25/0x30 > [ 14.786648] [] fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160 > [ 14.791447] [] flush_thread+0x57/0x60 > [ 14.796341] [] flush_old_exec+0x4cc/0x600 > [ 14.801594] [] load_elf_binary+0x2b0/0x1060 > [ 14.807010] [] ? get_user_pages_remote+0x50/0x60 > [ 14.812898] [] ? _copy_from_user+0x37/0x40 > [ 14.818236] [] search_binary_handler+0x62/0x150 > [ 14.824007] [] do_execveat_common+0x45c/0x600 > [ 14.829647] [] do_execve+0x1f/0x30 > [ 14.834289] [] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x91/0xe0 > [ 14.840765] [] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x40 > [ 14.846540] [] ? umh_complete+0x40/0x40 > [ 14.851626] ---[ end trace 137ff5893f9b85bf ]--- > > Is it know issue? Or what could I try to fix it? > > Reproducibility: 3 of 3. > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko