Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:23:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:23:40 -0500 Received: from filesrv1.baby-dragons.com ([199.33.245.55]:60055 "EHLO filesrv1.baby-dragons.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:23:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:34:09 -0500 (EST) From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Linux Kernel Maillist , linux-ns83820@kvack.org Subject: Re: problem w/ auto negotiate & ns83820 & netgear fsm726s switch In-Reply-To: <20030312131531.F16642@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20030312131531.F16642@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2961 Lines: 68 Hello Ben , On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:11:02AM -0500, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > The switch reports negotiating ... > > Port Name Link On/Off State Rate/Duplex Flow Ctrl > > 26GB Not Defined Up On Forwarding (10 Full) (Disabled) > > > > ns83820 reports , eth0: link now 1000F mbps, full duplex and up. > ... > > I am quite aware that this could well be a difficulty in the > > switch still . So I am looking for pointers on where to look ? > > I already tried the netgear suport site ;-} . That is why I am > > running the lastest code for the switch (1.0.4) . > It's entirely possible the card has a different polarity for the phy bits > as compared to the fibre card (Netgear) that the driver is already tested > on. Also, I've only managed to test on a cisco switch -- is there any > other hardware you can test against (ie using the fibre cable for cross > over) to narrow things down? Enabling debug and dumping the status bits > might hint as to what has to be changed. Thankfully Trendnet seems to > have programmed the subsystem id, so I'll be able to include the change > automatically. I have access to another one of those cards at work it reports the same items in the dmesg , I just looked at the switch it is attached to & it shows fine(*) . That switch manufacturer is an old Cabletron SSR4000 . But the thruput there is even worse (**). THO the ssr4k network isn't idle . And I am unable to aportion a time to make it idle . The previous emails test network was idle . After I get back from a road trip next week I'll try a back to back test . At least I hope I can when I get back . Twyl , JimL (*) # port show port-status gi.4.2 Flags: M - Mirroring enabled S - SmartTRUNK port Link Admin Port Port Type Duplex Speed Negotiation State State Flags ---- --------- ------ ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- gi.4.2 1 Gigabit Ethernet Full 1 Gbits Auto Up Up (**) $ tftp hostname tftp> mode binary tftp> get getme Received 675315712 bytes in 1169.8 seconds tftp> quit $ bc scale=10 675315712/1169.8 577291.5985638570 << bytes/sec last*8 4618332.7885108560 << bits/sec quit -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux | | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/