Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751492AbcCJNjC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:39:02 -0500
Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]:55497 "EHLO unicorn.mansr.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750751AbcCJNiz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:38:55 -0500
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
        Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: avr32 build failures in linux-next
References: <56B4C799.5070401@roeck-us.net> <56B4CE8C.8040307@gmail.com>
	<20160206115722.GA32647@samfundet.no>
	<yw1xwpqiey5d.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B61D21.2010407@roeck-us.net>
	<yw1xoabtg33u.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<CAHp75VdL4fK+vR4X=etWV7DPdop8azJcnrWr0OkvToqWte3ASw@mail.gmail.com>
	<56B964D9.8000300@roeck-us.net>
	<CAHp75Ve-ArHcma+0krWdvYCREZg3sLA=AoqcOaKgYhAW2KtYqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:38:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Ve-ArHcma+0krWdvYCREZg3sLA=AoqcOaKgYhAW2KtYqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Andy Shevchenko's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:30:55 +0200")
Message-ID: <yw1xmvq64fmd.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1048
Lines: 28

Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not very surprising either.  The number of people using Linux on avr32
>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still
>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts.
>>>
>>>
>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like
>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a
>>> burden on many drivers.
>>>
>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat
>> the h8300 experience.
>
> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle?
>
> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit:
> R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose.

The error goes away if CONFIG_AIO_THREAD is disabled.  Still don't know why.

-- 
Måns Rullgård