Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754070AbcCJRHm (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:07:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:38403 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752734AbcCJRHg (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:07:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove redundant smp_mb() in the kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() To: Lan Tianyu , Thomas Gleixner References: <1457055312-27067-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> <56D9354E.9040908@intel.com> <56D94BFE.1080406@redhat.com> <56DE8F1A.9000401@intel.com> <56DEEF69.20208@redhat.com> <56DFCE50.2000807@intel.com> Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Guangrong From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56E1A9D3.7080803@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:07:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56DFCE50.2000807@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1757 Lines: 55 On 09/03/2016 08:18, Lan Tianyu wrote: > How about the following comments. > > Log for kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() > /* > * We need to make sure everyone sees our modifications to > * the page tables and see changes to vcpu->mode here. Please mention that this pairs with vcpu_enter_guest and walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin/end. > The > * barrier in the kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() helps us to achieve > * these. Otherwise, wait for all vcpus to exit guest mode > * and/or lockless shadow page table walks. > */ > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); The rest of the comment is okay, but please replace "Otherwise" with "In addition, we need to". > Log for kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() > /* > * We want to publish modifications to the page tables before > * reading mode. Pairs with a memory barrier in arch-specific > * code. > * - x86: smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock in vcpu_enter_guest. ... and smp_mb in walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin/end. > * - powerpc: smp_mb in kvmppc_prepare_to_enter. > */ > smp_mb__before_atomic(); The comment looks good, but the smp_mb__before_atomic() is not needed. As mentioned in the reply to Guangrong, only a smp_load_acquire is required. So the comment should say something like "There is already an smp_mb() before kvm_make_all_cpus_request reads vcpu->mode. We reuse that barrier here.". On top of this there is: - the change to paging_tmpl.h that Guangrong posted, adding smp_wmb() before each increment of vcpu->kvm->tlbs_dirty - the change to smp_mb__after_atomic() in kvm_make_all_cpus_request - if you want :) you can also replace the store+mb in walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin with smp_store_mb, and the mb+store in walk_shadow_page_lockless_end with smp_store_release. Thanks, Paolo