Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932760AbcCJWqs (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:46:48 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:60000 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932089AbcCJWqp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:46:45 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Xiangliang Yu , lenb@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, SPG_Linux_Kernel@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add device HID for future AMD I2C controller Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2731127.s35Tc35DYy@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56E13104.8050307@linux.intel.com> References: <1457609692-25903-1-git-send-email-Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com> <56E13104.8050307@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1831 Lines: 46 On Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:32:04 AM Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 03/10/2016 01:34 PM, Xiangliang Yu wrote: > > Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that > > was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C > > controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu > > --- > > drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 1 + > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > > index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = { > > /* Generic apd devices */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE > > { "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) }, > > + { "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) }, > > { "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) }, > > { "AMD0030", }, > > #endif > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > > index 438f1b4..d656657 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = { > > { "80860F41", 0 }, > > { "808622C1", 0 }, > > { "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK }, > > + { "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK }, > > { "AMDI0510", 0 }, > > { "APMC0D0F", 0 }, > > { } > > -- > I guess these changes don't necessarily need to go together? Although I > think chances to get a conflict is pretty low. > > For i2c-designware: > Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula OK, queued up for 4.6, thanks! Rafael