Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:22:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>, vikas.shivappa@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, h.peter.anvin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support
In-Reply-To: <20160311225427.GG6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1603111519350.1432@vshiva-Udesk>
References: <1457652732-4499-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <20160311225427.GG6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 982
Lines: 31


On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> The patch series has two preparatory patch for cqm and then 4 MBM
>> patches. Patches are based on tip perf/core.
>
> They were not (or at least not a recent copy of it); all the files got
> moved about by someone..

Right, I mentioned based on perf/core because Thomas had a patch for 
topology_max_packages(which went to tip) on which these mbm are dependent - I 
tested although by applying 
the topology patch seperately on rc7 .. the perf/core for some reason did not 
have a lot of files including perf_event_intel_cqm.c

>
> But a little sed quickly fixed that.
>
> I also fixed a bunch of little things while applying and added a little
> cleanup patch at the end.
>
> Please see if the branch below works for you:
>
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core
>
You mean I test the mbm patches on top of this ?

Thanks,
Vikas