MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVNuCDJ8V4-MNcaup=kbMFrAH1etLFpBHtFSJHj2OCWEBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160312074329.GA19066@kmo-pixel>
	<CACVXFVOJA7=_1DUQm06Qn79xZMQXLob79egnwzOEfVreN2Uopw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160312092421.GA20839@kmo-pixel>
	<CACVXFVPDcvZEsNt7miMa4y+vsN15PLUZs29GA7UDWeTBiFE8OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160312121236.GA25403@kmo-pixel>
	<CACVXFVPk99t4nbhCFZz4kNxD6M=kiEJ30R-vTe-_zHLm4D89AQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160312134843.GA27821@kmo-pixel>
	<20160312140256.GA29313@kmo-pixel>
	<20160312222548.6a81d13b@tom-T450>
	<20160312143612.GA30418@kmo-pixel>
	<CACVXFVNuCDJ8V4-MNcaup=kbMFrAH1etLFpBHtFSJHj2OCWEBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:51:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyx1+JCs7BuU1TvQ5LzUHaijWV3q-e65g=JCgBkXZFvYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>, Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 769
Lines: 24

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am fine with either way, and I will prepare one patch and let Jens
> decide.

So guys, this needs to be done *now*.

And Jens - this is the last time I believe you when you say late
patches are required.

The buggy patch that introduced this problem was part of that very
late pull request that I already rejected once, and you then claimed
was absolutely required.

So the dicking around with the block layer stops *now*.

Seriously. I'm pissed off.

I don't want to see anything even half-way questionable during the
whole next release window. Not even during the merge window. You need
to do some serious quality control, and re-think the whole "large
changes" model.

            Linus