Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752435AbcCMGLS (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:11:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36898 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750941AbcCMGLM (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:11:12 -0500 Reply-To: xlpang@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] proc-vmcore: wrong data type casting fix References: <20160311084248.GA9417@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160311122711.f738d878070641f113dfd348@linux-foundation.org> <20160312044934.GA3173@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <56E40EF7.1050000@redhat.com> <20160312135932.GA3649@x1.redhat.com> To: Baoquan He , xlpang@redhat.com Cc: mhuang@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nasa4836@gmail.com, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Dave Young , vgoyal@redhat.com From: Xunlei Pang Message-ID: <56E5047A.6030007@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:11:06 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160312135932.GA3649@x1.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3971 Lines: 98 On 2016/03/12 at 21:59, Baoquan He wrote: > On 03/12/16 at 08:43pm, Xunlei Pang wrote: >> On 2016/03/12 at 12:49, Dave Young wrote: >>> Hi, Andrew >>> >>> On 03/11/16 at 12:27pm, Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:42:48 +0800 Dave Young wrote: >>>> >>>>> On i686 PAE enabled machine the contiguous physical area could be large >>>>> and it can cause trimming down variables in below calculation in >>>>> read_vmcore() and mmap_vmcore(): >>>>> >>>>> tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen); >>>>> >>>>> Then the real size passed down is not correct any more. >>>>> Suppose m->offset + m->size - *fpos being truncated to 0, buflen >0 then >>>>> we will get tsz = 0. It is of course not an expected result. >>>> I don't really understand this. >>>> >>>> vmcore.offset if loff_t which is 64-bit >>>> vmcore.size is long long >>>> *fpos is loff_t >>>> >>>> so the expression should all be done with 64-bit arithmetic anyway. >>> #define min_t(type, x, y) ({ \ >>> type __min1 = (x); \ >>> type __min2 = (y); \ >>> __min1 < __min2 ? __min1: __min2; }) >>> >>> Here x = m->offset + m->size - *fpos; the expression is done with 64bit >>> arithmetic, it is true. But x will be cast to size_t then compare x with y >>> The casting will cause problem. >>> >>>> Maybe buflen (size_t) has the wrong type, but the result of the other >>>> expression should be in-range by the time we come to doing the >>>> comparison. >>>> >>>>> During our tests there are two problems caused by it: >>>>> 1) read_vmcore will refuse to continue so makedumpfile fails. >>>>> 2) mmap_vmcore will trigger BUG_ON() in remap_pfn_range(). >>>>> >>>>> Use unsigned long long in min_t instead so that the variables are not >>>>> truncated. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He >>>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young >>>> I think we'll need a cc:stable here. >>> Agreed. Do you think I need repost for this? >>> >>>>> --- linux-x86.orig/fs/proc/vmcore.c >>>>> +++ linux-x86/fs/proc/vmcore.c >>>>> @@ -231,7 +231,9 @@ static ssize_t __read_vmcore(char *buffe >>>>> >>>>> list_for_each_entry(m, &vmcore_list, list) { >>>>> if (*fpos < m->offset + m->size) { >>>>> - tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen); >>>>> + tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long, >>>>> + m->offset + m->size - *fpos, >>>>> + buflen); >>>> This is rather a mess. Can we please try to fix this bug by choosing >>>> appropriate types rather than all the typecasting? >>> file read/mmap buflen is size_t, so tsz is alwyas less then buflen unless >>> m->offset + m->size - *fpos < buflen. The only problem is we need avoid large >>> value of m->offset + m->size - *fpos being casted thus it will mistakenly be >>> less than buflen. >> * >> Can we use "tsz = min(m->offset + m->size - *fpos, buflen)" instead? >> I think it's ok for this case (both have positive values), nothing will go wrong, >> also can make the code cleaner. > We can't. Macro min() has a type checking. min_t is necessary here. You're right, missed that :-) Regards, Xunlei > >> * >>>>> start = m->paddr + *fpos - m->offset; >>>>> tmp = read_from_oldmem(buffer, tsz, &start, userbuf); >>>>> if (tmp < 0) >>>>> @@ -461,7 +463,8 @@ static int mmap_vmcore(struct file *file >>>>> if (start < m->offset + m->size) { >>>>> u64 paddr = 0; >>>>> >>>>> - tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - start, size); >>>>> + tsz = (size_t)min_t(unsigned long long, >>>>> + m->offset + m->size - start, size); >>>>> paddr = m->paddr + start - m->offset; >>>>> if (vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(vma, vma->vm_start + len, >>>>> paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, tsz, >>> Thanks >>> Dave > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec