Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:26:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:26:10 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:42209 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:26:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:25:45 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alex Tomas Cc: bzzz@tmi.comex.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Message-Id: <20030313152545.24ba9d46.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20030313015840.1df1593c.akpm@digeo.com> <20030313142512.69f82864.akpm@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2003 23:30:57.0901 (UTC) FILETIME=[998A09D0:01C2E9B8] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 707 Lines: 29 Alex Tomas wrote: > > > done > done Thanks! > > AM> c) It looks like EXT2FS_DEBUG broke. Nobody uses that much, but > AM> we should fix and test it sometime. > > I suggest this to be fixed in separate patch. are you? Yes, that's fine. > ... > btw, what about minor bug in ext2 allocation code I posted recently? > do you agree it needs to be fixed? That's still in my inbox. I do not silently drop stuff, but am sometimes laggy. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/