Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754889AbcCOGpd (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:45:33 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:17794 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752118AbcCOGpZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:45:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 0/6] net: hns: hns driver updates To: David Miller References: <1457687446-109867-1-git-send-email-huangdaode@hisilicon.com> <56E76BB2.5060203@hisilicon.com> <20160314.224511.688178587092115078.davem@davemloft.net> CC: , , , , , , , , , , From: Daode Huang Message-ID: <56E7AF2D.4090606@hisilicon.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:43:57 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160314.224511.688178587092115078.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.61.13.197] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.56E7AF3D.005A,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: b4b0ff392af67e8c8660b5a6bcd0a748 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 839 Lines: 33 hi Dave, Thanks for your reply, I am so sorry to interrupt your work. Yes, the patch set should be reviewed by all the other developers. I should not only ask you to review the patch. I will resend all these patch after 4.6-rc-1 is released. Thanks. Daode. . On 2016/3/15 10:45, David Miller wrote: > From: Daode Huang > Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:56:02 +0800 > >> Could you please help me to review this patch set? > I am not reviewing anything until you guys sort out your submission > scheme, and resend these fresh using that central maintainer. > > I am also not the only person in the world who is supposed to review > all of this stuff, other developers need to help with the review > process as well. > > So it is never appropriate to ask me, and only me, to review your > work. > > Thanks. > > . >