Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 05:40:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 05:40:46 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:262 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 05:40:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:51:32 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: kernel list , vojtech@suse.cz, lm@bitmover.com Subject: Never ever use word BitKeeper if Larry does not like you Message-ID: <20030314105132.GB14270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2643 Lines: 67 Hi! Never ever use word KitBeeper, Larry thinks he owns the world. The page originally said "Goal of this project is to create version managment system compatible with ". Pavel PS: I know forwarding personal message to the mailing list is not polite, but this is more of legal threat than personal message... PPS: About Toyota: I may not be able to call my company Toyota (if you have registered trademark in czech republic, which I doubt), but I'm sure able to say that my car contains same engine as Toyota 1234cdt. And as you named directory in the repository BitKeeper, there's no chance not to mention it. ----- Forwarded message from Larry McVoy ----- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:21:54 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Pavel Machek Cc: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed BitKeeper clone User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i > Sorry, but I'm doing this on my own, this has nothing to do with SuSE. That's fine, I've taken it up with the sourceforge people. What you are doing is a violation of their terms of use and they'll get you to fix it, I don't care who fixes it, I want absolutely no reference to anything which can connect that work with BitKeeper. That's well with in our legal rights. As for it being on your own time, let's see if SuSE wants the negative publicity. I'm quite willing to make a stink, you've annoyed me and I've put up with as much as I'm going to. > I believe the wording above is okay; if you miss "BitKeeper is > trademark of BitMover" notice, I guess you can have that too. If you > want your lawyer to call me, my cellphone is +XXXXXXXXXXXX; if you > want to suggest alternate wording, just do that. But I believe saying > "compatible with (something)" is okay, and I can allways just misspell > it. No, you can't. Check into the case law. If there is any way to connect it to our product, it is within our rights to protect our brand. You can't call your new car company Toyotaa either, Toyota can sue and will if they think it infringes on their brand. You are quite welcome to write your own SCM. You may not take advantage of our work, check into the law. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/