Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965856AbcCOTyt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:54:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:35279 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934911AbcCOTys (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:54:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:54:44 -0700 From: Eduardo Valentin To: Wei Ni Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, MLongnecker@nvidia.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 05/12] thermal: tegra: add Tegra210 specific SOC_THERM driver Message-ID: <20160315195443.GD26619@localhost.localdomain> References: <1457665825-29837-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <20160314185739.GA1872@localhost.localdomain> <56E7B2E8.8070100@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2iBwrppp/7QCDedR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56E7B2E8.8070100@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2087 Lines: 62 --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:59:52PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 2016=E5=B9=B403=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5 02:57, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > >=20 > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:10:25AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > >> Add Tegra210 specific SOC_THERM driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni > >> --- > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm-fuse.c | 11 ++ > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 6 ++ > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.h | 4 + > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra210-soctherm.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++++ > >=20 > > No Kconfig change? >=20 > Yes, we doesn't need Kconfig change. >=20 > As discussed with Thierry in [V1,03/10] thermal: tegra: split tegra_socth= erm > driver, he said: > "I'd like to do this differently to reduce the number of Kconfig symbols. > The alternate proposal would be for the TEGRA_SOCTHERM symbol to remain > as it is and then build in driver support depending on the selected > ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC options." >=20 > So we only have "config TEGRA_SOCTHERM" in the Kconfig, and in Makefile, = we add > tegra-soctherm-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC) +=3D tegra124-soctherm.o > tegra-soctherm-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) +=3D tegra210-soctherm.o makes sense to me. --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW6GiBAAoJEMLUO4d9pOJWsd8H/AvSPyPqKdDWZ5Mvxkg/NLDW pVP5iKLW0btUOKBSP31v9T431aGgKXi2EBsHwVakZLTJ0kxmoqAqI4u4pRGtNHNJ 5VgVe+pgw8IXeMYzGqlcIRoMPdRZjiZ4OBzrkX9t1lgD7nQRQsdG9hCA7ec8g2fT 2eT1XlYz8UFSFQfilgwt5jKWOnK2DWvNvu4XzXG8CyDQ07S7jPT5dJzkCD0f9Zj8 MCDQQkTryOBoM5mGD4iVc3jL5XKQTaFGjrzSfAPlWFrcQnKdARtwepndbxwy3FdW 6LxRfxnG43d/jjGSMfeZr9ejJJJuOElys49IpshGfzFYSENSDJISX27T1TWYGR8= =yDIT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR--