Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:51:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:51:27 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:47571 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:51:25 -0500 Subject: Re: Never ever use word BitKeeper if Larry does not like you From: Alan Cox To: Larry McVoy Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree , Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , vojtech@suse.cz In-Reply-To: <20030314144347.GA8937@work.bitmover.com> References: <20030314105132.GB14270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030314115055.GR1211@marowsky-bree.de> <20030314144347.GA8937@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1047658249.29595.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 14 Mar 2003 16:10:49 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1792 Lines: 42 On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 14:43, Larry McVoy wrote: > You might want to stop and consider what SuSE would do if someone decided > they didn't like SuSE and came up with a pathetic shell script and started > describing it as "a system compatible with SuSE". I'm pretty sure that > your lawyers would be all over them in about 30 seconds. Ditto for Red > Hat, Alan. I believe it is your founder who has carefully explained to > all of us the importance of brand. In fact, isn't the point that Red Hat > is nothing *but* brand? So how fast would I get sued if I came out with > "Larry's Red Hat Linux"? Pretty fast, right? > > I stand behind my statements. If you don't like them, oh, darn. I thought you were above deliberately tangling unrelated questions to try and make a bogus point. Lets think about this clearly. "XYZ runs on Red Hat Linux" "XYZ reads Red Hat Linux RPM databases" "XYZ imports Oracle Databases into Bananavision" versus "Larry's Red Hat Linux" "compatible" is a tricky word. Claiming compatibility at least in the EU isn't about trademarks its about truth. If I say "compatible with all Ford cars", it should be exactly that. I'd certainly expect people to say things like "does [xyz] with [app] whatever" not "compatible with". So its fair for example IMHO to say "bitbucket is a tool for freeing bitkeeper data" but not to say things like "bitbucket is a bk replacement" And Red Hat is a lot more than brand. The value of a brand is not just the brand but what it delivers. Same with Bitkeeper as a brand. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/