Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263377AbTCNQAh>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:00:37 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263378AbTCNQAg>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:00:36 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:39294 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263377AbTCNQAf>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:00:35 -0500
Subject: Re: Never ever use word BitKeeper if Larry does not like you
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
       Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       vojtech@suse.cz, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030314151455.GB8937@work.bitmover.com>
References: <20030314105132.GB14270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	 <20030314115055.GR1211@marowsky-bree.de>
	 <20030314144347.GA8937@work.bitmover.com>
	 <1047658249.29595.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	 <20030314151455.GB8937@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1047658281.2566.101.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-3) 
Date: 14 Mar 2003 16:11:21 +0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1384
Lines: 35

Hi Larry,

On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 15:14, Larry McVoy wrote:

> Let's try a little simple substitution since you seem to be needing coffee
> this morning:
> 
>     "Red Cap: a proprietary Red Hat clone"
>     "The goal of this system is to produce a system compatible with Red Hat"
> 
> Go run those statements by your lawyers, Alan, and then please report
> what they said back here.  

I just did, and they said just what I'd expect from common sense.  A
compatibility claim is, in principle, just fine.

Specifically, any attempt to pass off something that didn't come from
Red Hat as an official Red Hat product was verboten; but 

        I would distinguish this from someone who is promoting their own
        product, let's call it BillyBob's Linux, and who makes a claim
        that it is "compatible with Red Hat Linux."  So long as the
        compatibility statement is not used prominently in the
        advertising of the product and so long as the statement is, in
        fact, true, this would likely constitute a fair use of our mark,
        roughly along the lines of comparative advertising.
        
Cheers,
 Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/