Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935071AbcCPOaa (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:30:30 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:49902 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933471AbcCPOa0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:30:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:30:22 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Kamil Debski , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Joachim Eastwood , Thomas Petazzoni , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Robert Jarzmik , Alexandre Belloni , Julia Lawall , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/24] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled() Message-ID: <20160316153022.164105d1@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1447664207-24370-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> References: <1447664207-24370-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1447664207-24370-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1419 Lines: 45 Hi Thierry, Can you please apply this patch? It's completely independent from the rest of the series. Thanks, Boris On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:56:24 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a > new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without > manipulating PWM internal fields. > Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly move to the atomic PWM > config approach without impacting PWM drivers. > Fix this driver to use pwm_is_enabled() instead of directly accessing the > ->flags field. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c > index 6e99a63..70899c9 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int rcar_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > return div; > > /* Let the core driver set pwm->period if disabled and duty_ns == 0 */ > - if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags) && !duty_ns) > + if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm) && !duty_ns) > return 0; > > rcar_pwm_update(rp, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR_SYNC, RCAR_PWMCR); -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com