Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755098AbcCPQaU (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:30:20 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:36362 "EHLO mail-vk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752119AbcCPQaR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:30:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E96225.2040508@atmel.com> References: <1457896247-25934-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <56E96225.2040508@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:30:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: macb: Checkpatch cleanups From: Moritz Fischer To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Michal Simek , joe@perches.com, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , moritz.fischer.private@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 22 Nicolas, On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 13/03/2016 20:10, Moritz Fischer a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> I backed out the variable scope changes and made a separate >> patch for the ether_addr_copy change. >> >> Changes from v1: > > As it's v2, it's better to add it in each subject of the patch series like: > "[PATCH v2 0/5] net: macb: Checkpatch cleanups" Yeah, I fat-fingered that. Figured it is less annoying than resending the series immediately. Do you want me to resend the series as v3 with Acked-bys and fixed patch 5? Through which tree will this go? Merci, Moritz