Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:27:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:27:08 -0500 Received: from linux.kappa.ro ([194.102.255.131]:42706 "EHLO linux.kappa.ro") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:27:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:37:49 +0200 From: Teodor Iacob To: Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Larry McVoy , Lars Marowsky-Bree , Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: Never ever use word BitKeeper if Larry does not like you Message-ID: <20030314203749.GB31888@linux.kappa.ro> References: <20030314105132.GB14270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030314115055.GR1211@marowsky-bree.de> <20030314144347.GA8937@work.bitmover.com> <1047658249.29595.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030314151455.GB8937@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030314151455.GB8937@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20011220) (linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2520 Lines: 56 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:14:55AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 04:10:49PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 14:43, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > You might want to stop and consider what SuSE would do if someone decided > > > they didn't like SuSE and came up with a pathetic shell script and started > > > describing it as "a system compatible with SuSE". I'm pretty sure that > > > your lawyers would be all over them in about 30 seconds. Ditto for Red > > > Hat, Alan. I believe it is your founder who has carefully explained to > > > all of us the importance of brand. In fact, isn't the point that Red Hat > > > is nothing *but* brand? So how fast would I get sued if I came out with > > > "Larry's Red Hat Linux"? Pretty fast, right? > > > > > > I stand behind my statements. If you don't like them, oh, darn. > > > > I thought you were above deliberately tangling unrelated questions to > > try and make a bogus point. Lets think about this clearly. > > > > "XYZ runs on Red Hat Linux" > > "XYZ reads Red Hat Linux RPM databases" > > "XYZ imports Oracle Databases into Bananavision" > > > > versus > > > > "Larry's Red Hat Linux" > > I thought you were above deliberately tangling unrelated questions to try > and distract from my perfectly valid point. > > "BitBucket: GPL-ed BitKeeper clone" > "The goal of this project is to produce a system compatible with BitKeeper" > > Let's try a little simple substitution since you seem to be needing coffee > this morning: > > "Red Cap: a proprietary Red Hat clone" > "The goal of this system is to produce a system compatible with Red Hat" > > Go run those statements by your lawyers, Alan, and then please report > what they said back here. Lawyer1 starts the process for the first statement: Lawyer1 got segmentation fault. Laywer2 starts the process for the second statement: Lawery2 got cpu xceeded. > -- > --- > Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/