Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S935841AbcCQL3n (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:29:43 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47654 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932876AbcCQL3j (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:29:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:30:54 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7][Update] cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on
 scheduler utilization data
Message-ID: <20160317113054.GG18212@e106622-lin>
References: <2495375.dFbdlAZmA6@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <4088601.C2vItRYpQn@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <1711281.bPmSjlBT7c@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <18957412.GBWZqUOZtk@vostro.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <18957412.GBWZqUOZtk@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1135
Lines: 45

Hi Rafael,

On 17/03/16 01:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

[...]

> +static void sugov_update_commit(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
> +				unsigned int next_freq)
> +{
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
> +
> +	sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
> +
> +	if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
> +		if (next_freq > policy->max)
> +			next_freq = policy->max;
> +		else if (next_freq < policy->min)
> +			next_freq = policy->min;
> +
> +		if (sg_policy->next_freq == next_freq) {
> +			trace_cpu_frequency(policy->cur, smp_processor_id());
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		sg_policy->next_freq = next_freq;
> +		next_freq = cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, next_freq);
> +		if (next_freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
> +			return;
> +
> +		policy->cur = next_freq;
> +		trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, smp_processor_id());
> +	} else if (sg_policy->next_freq != next_freq) {
> +		sg_policy->work_cpu = smp_processor_id();

  +		sg_policy->next_freq = next_freq;

> +		irq_work_queue(&sg_policy->irq_work);
> +	}
> +}

Or we remain at max_f :-).

Best,

- Juri