Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935708AbcCQLiI (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:38:08 -0400 Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:35948 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752645AbcCQLiF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:38:05 -0400 From: Alexey Brodkin To: "sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com" CC: "robh@kernel.org" , "preid@electromag.com.au" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARC: axs10x - add Ethernet PHY description in .dts Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] ARC: axs10x - add Ethernet PHY description in .dts Thread-Index: AQHRgDFHP+tIaSW/PEyPKVxAhXF5RJ9dZq8AgAALEwA= Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:37:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1458214678.14496.15.camel@synopsys.com> References: <1458207712-29435-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <56EA8DCC.8070308@cogentembedded.com> In-Reply-To: <56EA8DCC.8070308@cogentembedded.com> Accept-Language: en-US, ru-RU Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.225.15.82] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7" Content-ID: <9E74614347558B4E8E83D082031B8B98@internal.synopsys.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 20 Hi Sergei, On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 13:58 +-0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: +AD4- On 3/17/2016 12:41 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Following commit broke DW GMAC functionality on AXS10x boards: +AD4- +AD4- http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id+AD0-e34d65696d2ef13dc32f2a162556c86c461ed763 +AD4- +AKAAoACgAKA-Note that scripts/checkpatch.pl now enforces certain format for citing+AKA- +AD4- commits: commit +ADw-12-digit SHA1+AD4- (+ACIAPA-commit summary+AD4AIg-). Frankly I haven't run that patch through checkpatch due to patch simplicity. But I'll try to not do any assumptions from now on and will try to use checkpatch for each and every thing I send :) Thanks for spotting all his+ACE- -Alexey