Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967316AbcCQVZx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:25:53 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:35598 "EHLO mail-yw0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967141AbcCQVZu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:25:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160317211910.GB2611@joana> References: <1458235817-28375-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <1458235817-28375-2-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <1458236486.9556.11.camel@perches.com> <20160317180523.GA2619@joana> <20160317184318.GA2611@joana> <1458246150.9556.17.camel@perches.com> <1458247207.9556.28.camel@perches.com> <1458249003.9556.30.camel@perches.com> <20160317211910.GB2611@joana> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:25:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] kernel.h: add to_user_ptr() From: Rob Clark To: Gustavo Padovan , Joe Perches , Rob Clark , Gustavo Padovan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Daniel Stone , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Riley Andrews , Daniel Vetter , Greg Hackmann , John Harrison , Maarten Lankhorst , Andrew Morton , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , linuxppc-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 30 On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-03-17 Joe Perches : > >> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 16:50 -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> [] >> > > It's a name that seems like it should be a straightforward >> > > cast of a kernel pointer to a __user pointer like: >> > > >> > > static inline void __user *to_user_ptr(void *p) >> > > { >> > > return (void __user *)p; >> > > } >> > ahh, ok. I guess I was used to using it in the context of ioctl >> > structs.. in that context u64 -> (void __user *) made more sense. >> > >> > Maybe uapi_to_ptr()? (ok, not super-creative.. maybe someone has a >> > better idea) >> >> Maybe u64_to_user_ptr? > > That is a good name. If everyone agrees I can resend this patch > changing it to u64_to_user_ptr. Then should we still keep it on > kernel.h? works for me BR, -R