Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755224AbcCRJSr (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:18:47 -0400 Received: from smtp6-v.fe.bosch.de ([139.15.237.11]:38208 "EHLO smtp6-v.fe.bosch.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754122AbcCRJSk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:18:40 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-next: Crash in arm_pmu_device_probe() due to 'drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info messages more verbose' To: Guenter Roeck References: <56EBA3C3.10907@roeck-us.net> CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon From: Dirk Behme Organization: Robert Bosch Car Multimedia GmbH Message-ID: <56EBC7EC.6000907@de.bosch.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:18:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EBA3C3.10907@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.34.217.168] X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22198.006 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: VfovoVrt/oboSitJVour/Sa1MaKuob8Pt3aeg7g/usDkMnUVL5d0Ezur Vh7NYTzj3CqjRB/5O61FxD71JMaSRAAlmTJXSGlm4RtSDjG+z7DSL+EVfOJR08lgi/vLS272fAq ezVEoJcKLskPiaWiwhIIkS2U7FTVbszLAY5oHhBCwr5ZZVOw5deWNJG9IamrcrY9uF6odMlwHtd YFc57FhcRMagjlsxrM/Jz+1598eUCGrovtAHQqCZmug812qIbz0w14HFJQjaOUcGwJcNu10PqxH PWD+2Wj4vM1YF6AJbZFi+KwZZttL1QAAzJkx/SoseWplitmp0j6C0ePs7A07dTGCNBptnYuhGDx MTgxwNkCkaxiynLX1N8PpGuMQTkvoVT/nc6AeFBWXGvUUmKP2w== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2039 Lines: 77 Hi Guenter, On 18.03.2016 07:44, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing the attached crash when running a realview-pb-a8 image with > realview_defconfig in qemu. > bisect wasn't successful, but a commit analysis identified commit > 'drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info > messages more verbose' as the culprit. Reverting this commit fixes the > problem. > > The code roughly looks as follows. > > int arm_pmu_device_probe() > { > ... > if (node && ..) { > } else { > } > > if (ret) { > pr_info("%s: failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n", > node->full_name, ret); > goto out_free; > } > .... > out_free: > pr_info("%s: failed to register PMU devices! Error %i\n", > node->full_name, ret); > .... > } > > Note that 'node' is dereferenced even though it was previously checked > if it is NULL. > The configuration I am testing does not use devicetree. > > Can you use dev_info() instead ? Does anything like below [1] does work for you? If so, could you please share the output? I.e. what it prints in your non-devicetree non-pmu case? Best regards Dirk [1] diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c index 11bacc7..bda3502 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c @@ -1002,8 +1002,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, } if (ret) { - pr_info("%s: failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n", - node->full_name, ret); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe PMU! Error %i\n", ret); goto out_free; } @@ -1023,8 +1022,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, out_destroy: cpu_pmu_destroy(pmu); out_free: - pr_info("%s: failed to register PMU devices! Error %i\n", - node->full_name, ret); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "failed to register PMU devices! Error %i\n", ret); kfree(pmu); return ret; }