Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932212AbcCRR3q (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:29:46 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0160.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.160]:51898 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbcCRR3o (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:29:44 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:560:599:960:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2198:2199:2200:2393:2559:2562:2731:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3872:4184:4321:5007:6261:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12295:12517:12519:12555:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:13618:13894:14659:14721:21060:21080:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:3,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: knot90_1a4f1f4af841f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1515 Message-ID: <1458322179.26915.2.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix order of flag descriptions From: Joe Perches To: Luis de Bethencourt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:29:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> References: <1458317369-28185-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 539 Lines: 13 On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. > > Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt > --- > Hi, > > I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl was giving > a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the wrong order > breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below checkpatch.pl does > not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. checkpatch complains? ?About what?