Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757676AbcCRRi6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:38:58 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32964 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752647AbcCRRiz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:38:55 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:38:52 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
        acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools lib api: respect CROSS_COMPILE for the linker
Message-ID: <20160318173852.GD2701@redhat.com>
References: <1458235670-27341-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
 <20160318162547.GA2701@redhat.com>
 <20160318163815.qe7f7cwzis4riwnj@treble.redhat.com>
 <20160318164522.GB2701@redhat.com>
 <20160318171623.mih7ozxyinn33ads@treble.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160318171623.mih7ozxyinn33ads@treble.redhat.com>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1188
Lines: 30

Em Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:16:23PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:45:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:38:15AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:25:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Which is different from what the kernel does in its main Makefile:

> > # Make variables (CC, etc...)
> > AS              = $(CROSS_COMPILE)as
> > LD              = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld
> > CC              = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc

> > I wonder if we could settle in one of these styles or if there is really
> > a reason to be creative :-)

> > Better, all this could go to tools/scripts/Makefile.include?
 
> Yeah, I agree that it would be good to come up with a common and
> consistent approach tools-wide if possible.

<SNOP>
> So 'allow-override' would probably be a good option.

Humm, my preference is to make tools/ look like the kernel, and the
kernel doesn't use that allow-override thing, right? So perhaps add what
is missing to make it look exactly like the kernel and then ditch this
allow-override thing?

What about having all this in a single place in tools/script/?

- Arnaldo