Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:47:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:47:27 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:46559 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:47:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 09:58:02 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: James Bottomley cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Germaschewski Subject: Re: [patch] NUMAQ subarchification Message-ID: <16190000.1047751081@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <1047750799.1964.72.camel@mulgrave> References: <1047676332.5409.374.camel@mulgrave><3E7284CA.6010907@us.ibm.com> <3E7285E7.8080802@us.ibm.com> <247240000.1047693951@flay> <1047750799.1964.72.camel@mulgrave> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 21 >> No, *please* don't do this. Subarch for .c files is *broken*. > > It is the place designed for code belonging only to one subarch. That doesn't mean it's not broken. >> Let's just stick with your original patch - it's fine. > > No, it's not. The object of the subarch is to remove all subarch > specific files from the main i386/kernel directory. It needs fixing to avoid the duplication first ... after that it'll be a fine idea. Until that, I'm not moving any code under there. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/