Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:46:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:46:11 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:28195 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:46:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:53:39 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: dan carpenter cc: Linux Kernel , "" Subject: Re: Any hope for ide-scsi (error handling)? In-Reply-To: <200303151926.h2FJQLnB103490@pimout1-ext.prodigy.net> Message-ID: References: <200303151926.h2FJQLnB103490@pimout1-ext.prodigy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 857 Lines: 28 On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, dan carpenter wrote: > On Saturday 15 March 2003 07:55 pm, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > > bad: scheduling while atomic! > > Call Trace: > > > > 887 spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags); > 888 while (HWGROUP(drive)->handler) { > 889 HWGROUP(drive)->handler = NULL; > 890 schedule_timeout(1); > 891 } > > Here is at least one bad call to schedule() in > static int idescsi_reset (Scsi_Cmnd *cmd) Apart from the schedule with the ide_lock held, what is that code actually doing? Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/