Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753560AbcCTSm0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:42:26 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:61069 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594AbcCTSlv (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:41:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,367,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="937918650" From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Lameter , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH 27/71] cramfs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:40:34 +0300 Message-Id: <1458499278-1516-28-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0 In-Reply-To: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 9160 Lines: 235 PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> ; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt | 2 +- fs/cramfs/README | 26 +++++++++++++------------- fs/cramfs/inode.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt index 31f53f0ab957..4006298f6707 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ the update lasts only as long as the inode is cached in memory, after which the timestamp reverts to 1970, i.e. moves backwards in time. Currently, cramfs must be written and read with architectures of the -same endianness, and can be read only by kernels with PAGE_CACHE_SIZE +same endianness, and can be read only by kernels with PAGE_SIZE == 4096. At least the latter of these is a bug, but it hasn't been decided what the best fix is. For the moment if you have larger pages you can just change the #define in mkcramfs.c, so long as you don't diff --git a/fs/cramfs/README b/fs/cramfs/README index 445d1c2d7646..9d4e7ea311f4 100644 --- a/fs/cramfs/README +++ b/fs/cramfs/README @@ -86,26 +86,26 @@ Block Size (Block size in cramfs refers to the size of input data that is compressed at a time. It's intended to be somewhere around -PAGE_CACHE_SIZE for cramfs_readpage's convenience.) +PAGE_SIZE for cramfs_readpage's convenience.) The superblock ought to indicate the block size that the fs was written for, since comments in indicate that -PAGE_CACHE_SIZE may grow in future (if I interpret the comment +PAGE_SIZE may grow in future (if I interpret the comment correctly). -Currently, mkcramfs #define's PAGE_CACHE_SIZE as 4096 and uses that -for blksize, whereas Linux-2.3.39 uses its PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, which in +Currently, mkcramfs #define's PAGE_SIZE as 4096 and uses that +for blksize, whereas Linux-2.3.39 uses its PAGE_SIZE, which in turn is defined as PAGE_SIZE (which can be as large as 32KB on arm). This discrepancy is a bug, though it's not clear which should be changed. -One option is to change mkcramfs to take its PAGE_CACHE_SIZE from +One option is to change mkcramfs to take its PAGE_SIZE from . Personally I don't like this option, but it does require the least amount of change: just change `#define -PAGE_CACHE_SIZE (4096)' to `#include '. The disadvantage +PAGE_SIZE (4096)' to `#include '. The disadvantage is that the generated cramfs cannot always be shared between different kernels, not even necessarily kernels of the same architecture if -PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is subject to change between kernel versions +PAGE_SIZE is subject to change between kernel versions (currently possible with arm and ia64). The remaining options try to make cramfs more sharable. @@ -126,22 +126,22 @@ size. The options are: 1. Always 4096 bytes. 2. Writer chooses blocksize; kernel adapts but rejects blocksize > - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. + PAGE_SIZE. 3. Writer chooses blocksize; kernel adapts even to blocksize > - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. + PAGE_SIZE. It's easy enough to change the kernel to use a smaller value than -PAGE_CACHE_SIZE: just make cramfs_readpage read multiple blocks. +PAGE_SIZE: just make cramfs_readpage read multiple blocks. -The cost of option 1 is that kernels with a larger PAGE_CACHE_SIZE +The cost of option 1 is that kernels with a larger PAGE_SIZE value don't get as good compression as they can. The cost of option 2 relative to option 1 is that the code uses variables instead of #define'd constants. The gain is that people -with kernels having larger PAGE_CACHE_SIZE can make use of that if +with kernels having larger PAGE_SIZE can make use of that if they don't mind their cramfs being inaccessible to kernels with -smaller PAGE_CACHE_SIZE values. +smaller PAGE_SIZE values. Option 3 is easy to implement if we don't mind being CPU-inefficient: e.g. get readpage to decompress to a buffer of size MAX_BLKSIZE (which diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c index b862bc219cd7..3a32ddf98095 100644 --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb, * page cache and dentry tree anyway.. * * This also acts as a way to guarantee contiguous areas of up to - * BLKS_PER_BUF*PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, so that the caller doesn't need to + * BLKS_PER_BUF*PAGE_SIZE, so that the caller doesn't need to * worry about end-of-buffer issues even when decompressing a full * page cache. */ @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb, */ #define BLKS_PER_BUF_SHIFT (2) #define BLKS_PER_BUF (1 << BLKS_PER_BUF_SHIFT) -#define BUFFER_SIZE (BLKS_PER_BUF*PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) +#define BUFFER_SIZE (BLKS_PER_BUF*PAGE_SIZE) static unsigned char read_buffers[READ_BUFFERS][BUFFER_SIZE]; static unsigned buffer_blocknr[READ_BUFFERS]; @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static void *cramfs_read(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int offset, unsigned i if (!len) return NULL; - blocknr = offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; - offset &= PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1; + blocknr = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; + offset &= PAGE_SIZE - 1; /* Check if an existing buffer already has the data.. */ for (i = 0; i < READ_BUFFERS; i++) { @@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ static void *cramfs_read(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int offset, unsigned i continue; if (blocknr < buffer_blocknr[i]) continue; - blk_offset = (blocknr - buffer_blocknr[i]) << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; + blk_offset = (blocknr - buffer_blocknr[i]) << PAGE_SHIFT; blk_offset += offset; if (blk_offset + len > BUFFER_SIZE) continue; return read_buffers[i] + blk_offset; } - devsize = mapping->host->i_size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; + devsize = mapping->host->i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; /* Ok, read in BLKS_PER_BUF pages completely first. */ for (i = 0; i < BLKS_PER_BUF; i++) { @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void *cramfs_read(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int offset, unsigned i wait_on_page_locked(page); if (!PageUptodate(page)) { /* asynchronous error */ - page_cache_release(page); + put_page(page); pages[i] = NULL; } } @@ -229,12 +229,12 @@ static void *cramfs_read(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int offset, unsigned i struct page *page = pages[i]; if (page) { - memcpy(data, kmap(page), PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); + memcpy(data, kmap(page), PAGE_SIZE); kunmap(page); - page_cache_release(page); + put_page(page); } else - memset(data, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); - data += PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; + memset(data, 0, PAGE_SIZE); + data += PAGE_SIZE; } return read_buffers[buffer] + offset; } @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int cramfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf) u64 id = huge_encode_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev); buf->f_type = CRAMFS_MAGIC; - buf->f_bsize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; + buf->f_bsize = PAGE_SIZE; buf->f_blocks = CRAMFS_SB(sb)->blocks; buf->f_bfree = 0; buf->f_bavail = 0; @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int cramfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page) int bytes_filled; void *pgdata; - maxblock = (inode->i_size + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; + maxblock = (inode->i_size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; bytes_filled = 0; pgdata = kmap(page); @@ -516,14 +516,14 @@ static int cramfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page) if (compr_len == 0) ; /* hole */ - else if (unlikely(compr_len > (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE << 1))) { + else if (unlikely(compr_len > (PAGE_SIZE << 1))) { pr_err("bad compressed blocksize %u\n", compr_len); goto err; } else { mutex_lock(&read_mutex); bytes_filled = cramfs_uncompress_block(pgdata, - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, + PAGE_SIZE, cramfs_read(sb, start_offset, compr_len), compr_len); mutex_unlock(&read_mutex); @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int cramfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page) } } - memset(pgdata + bytes_filled, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - bytes_filled); + memset(pgdata + bytes_filled, 0, PAGE_SIZE - bytes_filled); flush_dcache_page(page); kunmap(page); SetPageUptodate(page); -- 2.7.0