Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:18:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:18:34 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:13060 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:17:41 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:45:58 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ockman@penguincomputing.com, dev@work.bitmover.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BK->CVS (real time mirror) Message-ID: <20030316134558.GH8057@zaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20030312034330.GA9324@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312034330.GA9324@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 23 Hi! > (actually Wayne Scott) did was to write a graph traversal alg which > finds the longest path through the revision history which includes > all tags. For the 2.5 tree, that is currently 8298 distinct points. > Each of those points has been captured in CVS as a commit. If we did As far as I can see, linux-2.5 repository has over 17000 ChangeSets, that means half the granularity. Would it be possible to use cvs branches to capture tree structure and have special form of commit comment "this is merge of changeset 1.2.3.4"? That way BK->CVS conversion could preserve all the data... Pavel -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/