Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755665AbcCTTCt (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:02:49 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:54426 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752166AbcCTSlm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:41:42 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,367,1455004800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="941355976"
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/71] s390: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:40:12 +0300
Message-Id: <1458499278-1516-6-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0
In-Reply-To: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1725
Lines: 50

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago
with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with
bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_*
or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the
border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
index 0f3da2cb2bd6..255c7eec4481 100644
--- a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
+++ b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ static int hypfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 	sbi->uid = current_uid();
 	sbi->gid = current_gid();
 	sb->s_fs_info = sbi;
-	sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
-	sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_SIZE;
+	sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_SHIFT;
 	sb->s_magic = HYPFS_MAGIC;
 	sb->s_op = &hypfs_s_ops;
 	if (hypfs_parse_options(data, sb))
-- 
2.7.0