Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:39:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:39:17 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:16844 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:39:16 -0500 Message-ID: <34108.4.64.238.61.1047765001.squirrel@www.osdl.org> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:50:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: In-Reply-To: <1047765218.9619.124.camel@lan1> References: <200303151621.h2FGLgaD003246@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <20030315212205.CDE923D979@mx01.nexgo.de> <1047765218.9619.124.camel@lan1> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 32 >> > > Does anybody have a convenient mailing list for this design >> discussion? >> > >> > Good idea to move this off LKML >> >> Yup, but nobody has offered one yet, so... > > I think the arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net list would be happy to host > continuing discussion in this vein. Considering Larry's repeated > attempts to get people to look at arch as a "better fit," it seems > particularly appropriate. > > Of course, you'd have to tolerate "arch community" views on a lot of these > issues, but I suspect that might help focus the discussion. > > Bob > - Yes, that sounds good to me too. And they have already begun a list of what gcc and Linux kernel SCM requirements (see http://arch.fifthvision.net/bin/view/Arx/WebHome for "Requirements"). ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/