Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:55:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:55:49 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:33747 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:55:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:06:18 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alex Tomas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Message-ID: <20030315220618.GY20188@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , Alex Tomas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20030315135158.6d5fef1a.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030315135158.6d5fef1a.akpm@digeo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 22 At some point in the past, Alex Tomas wrote: >> struct ext2_bg_info { >> u8 debts; >> spinlock_t balloc_lock; >> + spinlock_t ialloc_lock; >> unsigned int reserved; >> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a > single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that > sometime? Benching now. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/