Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757447AbcCUR3m (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:29:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]:33763 "EHLO mail-ig0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757202AbcCUR3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:29:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:29:36 -0600 From: Tycho Andersen To: Chris Murphy Cc: Btrfs BTRFS , linux-kernel Subject: Re: confusing mountinfo output when bind-mounting files Message-ID: <20160321172936.GO8544@smitten> References: <20160321152144.GL8544@smitten> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1731 Lines: 36 On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:22:06AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Tycho Andersen > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm seeing some strange behavior when bind mounting files from a btrfs > > subvolume. Consider the output below: > > > > root@criu2:/tmp# mount -o loop /tmp/tester.btrfs /tmp/dir1 > > root@criu2:/tmp# touch dir1/file > > root@criu2:/tmp# sudo mount --bind dir1/file dir2/file > > root@criu2:/tmp# grep "/tmp/dir" /proc/self/mountinfo > > 128 24 0:45 / /tmp/dir1 rw,relatime shared:107 - btrfs /dev/loop0 rw,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ > > 129 24 0:45 /file /tmp/dir2/file rw,relatime shared:107 - btrfs /dev/loop0 rw,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/file > > root@criu2:/tmp# btrfs --version > > btrfs-progs v4.4 > > root@criu2:/tmp# uname -a > > Linux criu2 4.4.0-8-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 24 20:45:30 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > The issue here is that the "subvol=" mount option for the target of the bind > > mount is "/file" when no such subvolume actually exists. Is this > > intended? It's confusing to say the least, but seems like a bug to me. > > Since btrfs mount subvol= is a bind mount behind the scene, I'm > not sure the mount info code distinguishes between bind mounts. > > At the moment, this is something of a secret decoder ring where if you > see subvolid=5 first, then anything after that other than / is just > not true (can't be). Hence probably why both subvolid and subvol are > listed for now; you kinda have to parse them both. Ok, so if I'm trying to compare superblocks from userspace, I should look for subvolid and see if those match, and if that isn't present then look for subvol? Tycho